Skip to main content

Hands on with the Pentax K-30

I was able to have a brief hands on with the new Pentax K-30 camera body at Camera Craft Inc. in Rockford, Illinois. EDIT, they closed down when the owner retired. 

My overall impressions:

The camera feels a lot more solid than I expected it to be. Of course, the casing is all plastic, but it has a solid feel to it. From what I can recall from the K-x and K-r, they feel cheap compared to the K-30 by a good margin.


The grip is probably one of the better ones to come out from Pentax. It isn’t as soft as the K-5, but is actually a bit better in fitting all of my fingers on the grip (instead of the pinky being off the camera. It still isn’t tall enough for my entire hand to be completely comfortable, but a bit better.

The design reminds me of the K-10/K-20 and I can’t say I like that. I think Pentax’s best design from the Digital age would be the K-7/K-5 as well as the *ist D. There are some embellishments that I think might have a little bit of function to them, but their primary purpose is form. The large flash pop-up mechanism for one. Besides that, I think they generally tried to add some nice little touches to the plastic to make things function better. The dimples and dots in some sections make griping and using the camera just a little bit easier. I good example would be the small ridges on the 4-way control buttons.


They made a few design sacrifices to keep costs down and to fit the middle/entry level target of the camera. The main control dial doesn’t have a lock on it like the K-5 and I suspect that is the case because it costs more to weather seal a dial with a button on the top of it. They didn’t include a few relatively standard ports like HDMI and a MIC port.


The camera seems fast, but I didn’t get much time to use it. I oddly enough don’t recall what the shutter sounded like, so it must not have been too loud.


It has peaking focus (yes, I like this a lot on the K-01, so I just had to mention it).
This camera is focused on being a camera. It, of course, has a feature-full video recording mode, but with the admission of HDMI port, MIC port, and a dedicated video record button, it is best suited to still photography. I think that’s actually admirable in this current DSLR climate. This camera is purpose built.


As you should already know, this cameras has weather sealing, so with a proper lens, you shouldn’t have to worry too much about using the camera in the rain. A great feature I’m glad that Pentax is expanding their lineup with. 


Oddly, Pentax has started with kits that include the non-weather resistant 18-55mm DA-L kit lens. They offer a kit with the DA 18-135mm WR lens, but that might be a bit expensive for some people. While I understand that offering the cheapest lens possible is good for some customers that don’t have a desire to pay more for WR, I just don’t understand why they are not offering the weather resistant version of the 18-55mm in a kit too. 

I didn’t get a chance to test out the camera performance wise, but my general impressions are positive. It seems like a good camera for a multitude of different types of photographers. The starting price of $850 seems like a decent deal, but I think around $879 with a DA 18-55mm WR would have been a more appealing price and a more convincing package. 

Without a true entry level camera at the moment, Pentax might be hard pressed wooing the large majority of basic buyers that they should spend hundreds of dollars extra over the $600 – $700 entry cameras. They won’t necessarily understand that having two control wheels and weather resistance are worthwhile features. Chances are they will see the omissions first.

For me personally, I don’t have a need for this camera as the K-01 and K-5 fill the shoes without any room for a K-30. However, take the incremental improvements and add that to a K-5 or higher level camera and now we are talking (minus my inability to afford such a camera currently). I’m sure that type of camera is next on the agenda, or maybe we will see a direct K-r replacement first. 


Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. Check out the full video on YouTube:   The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the ...

7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 for Nikon Z-mount Overview

In this overview, I'm taking a look at the 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 lens for the Nikon Z system. Is it worth considering over the official Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8s lens? I also compare it with the Nikon Z 24-50mm f/4-6.3 kit lens at 50mm.  Check out the full video on YouTube :  7Artisans sent me this lens to try out based on my  collaboration terms . They had no say in the content produced and were not allowed to preview it.  Build Quality & Handling 7Artisans and Nikon lens side-by-side. The 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 is similar in size to Nikon's 50mm f/1.8s, although it's slightly taller and a bit thinner. Both lenses feature a manual/auto focus switch, but I found that the one on the 7Artisans lens requires less travel and is easier to push, which isn't ideal. You might accidentally switch modes while handling the lens. Something I found myself doing a couple of times on my photowalk. The AF/MF switch and aperture adjustment ring. The manual focus ring on the 7Artisans lens...

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Check out the YouTube video here : Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5m...