Skip to main content

Ricoh GXR is finally starting to make sense...

Even at first look before the acquisition, Ricoh and Pentax seemed pretty similar. They both released cameras that were smaller than the class norm. that also included quality materials like magnesium alloy and an overall solid feel. More specifically, cameras like the GR Digital and the Pentax K-7/K-5 series. In their fight to gain and keep market share they sometimes have gone outside the box in ways that just didn’t make much sense.

Look for used Ricoh GXR equipment on eBay or KEH.

As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases.


The Ricoh GXR system is one such camera to go far out of the box.


It’s not an interchangeable lens system and it’s not a fixed lens camera like their GR Digital. The body that houses the grip, controls, LCD, and battery is one unit. The other half of the camera gets mounted inside. This has the lens, sensor, and processing electronics. On first…and second… glance the system doesn’t make much sense. It is expensive because to use a different lens you must pay the price premium to buy a sensor and processing engine with it. Your old lens doesn’t gain any benefits from the new sensor because each unit is completely self contained. While they can argue that the lens sensor units are weather sealed, the connection between that and the hand grip unit seems like just as much of a possible point-of-failure.

So with lens units that fit into a common hand grip unit, things just didn’t look very appealing. It is certainly a different concept, but with no benefit that jumps out at you.

The story doesn’t end there though. Ricoh just released the “GXR Mount A12” that is a module that has a Leica M mount instead of a lens. Yes, the system starts to finally make sense, at least in part. The unit is $650 at the time of this article, which is expensive yet cheap at the same time. It is the cheapest M mount camera you will find, but from a more global market perspective, you can spend half the money and buy a micro 4/3rds mount camera. For anyone who already owns the grip portion, it isn’t a bad deal if you have or want to get some M mount glass.

Beside the new M mount module, I can see some nice possibilities for the GXR system.

  • Now that Ricoh owns Pentax, they should release a K-mount module. Modules like the K and M mounts have a long history with thousands of lenses out there.
  • Offer up a grip module that has an optical viewfinder. That could be with a fixed lens or a mount that would allow for such.
  • Offer up a module and/or grip portion geared toward different uses like videography. Imagine using the new M mount module with a grip module that has pro level features used in videography. The challenge there might be that the grip modules don’t really do much of the technical processing engine related work. Even so, the grip could have a great interface and handling to expedite the work of each style.

Note: The Thailand flood pushed back getting the new mount module, but come February it should be available.

While still and odd bird of the current systems out there, the GXR seems to have some promise. That is if they can deliver more interesting things like the A12 mount module.


Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the sensor. The Z5ii gets a backside-illumi...

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5mm (W x L) Viltrox: 65mm x 72mm Both lenses have an ape...

Swapping Gear with MPB: A Hands-On Experience

I'm always looking for ways to upgrade my camera gear without the hassle of selling it myself. Recently, I decided to try something different: swapping my old equipment for new gear with MPB and getting some cash at the same time. I've used them to purchase equipment in the past, but this was my first time trading in. In the video I explain how it went, and I'll walk you through the entire process, from getting a quote to unboxing the new-to-me equipment.  It's a simple concept: you send them gear, and they send you stuff back. In this particular case, I even got some money in addition to the equipment because my trade-ins were valued higher than what I wanted at the time.  Why go this route instead of selling equipment directly? For me, it all comes down to time and convenience. The entire process, from shipping my gear to receiving the new equipment, took 11 days. They received it, assessed everything, sent me a final quote, I approved it, and then they shipped the n...