Skip to main content

Second SD and Micro SD card Speed Testing Article

The first article on the speed of the SD cards I wrote was pretty successful. I get quite a bit of traffic from that, so I think people probably find it useful. The issue with writing follow up articles is that I’m limited to what I have on hand to test with (if you have contacts to acquire test cards let me know). It’s been a few months and I did buy 4 extra SD cards (2 types) making it possible to write another article. In addition to those regular SD cards I scavenged around to find any else that would be testable. I eventually found quite a few micro SD cards, and I also have a single new Compact Flash card that I was curious about performance.

The goal in this article, as was in the first, is to see how fast these cards write data. When being used in a camera, the write speed is the most important factor to performance.


The testing process:
I went over this in the first article, but basically I use a built-in Ubuntu Linux utility to test the speed of the cards in an internal USB based card reader I have in my computer. It looks like the process changed slightly because Ubuntu changed the text on a few buttons and labels, so I will just include a quick process below.



– Go into the desktop menu of System >> Administration >> Disk Utility
– “Format Drive” button >> “Don’t partition” list option
– “Benchmark” (Measure drive performance) button
– “Start Read/Write Benchmark” (Measure read rate, write rate and access time) button
– “Are you sure…?” will pop-up, click the final “Benchmark” button

As this this is quite a few months later and the Operating System has updated itself since then, I can’t guarantee the results between the two articles are comparable. However, I used the same process, so they should be. The only different variable of this test compared to the first is that in my camera test video I was forced to use my K-7 camera instead of the K-5 because it is in Arizona being serviced. The video was taken at 320×240 with an old digicam and pieced together at 720P in Kdenlive. Anyways, take note that the K-7 is a 14 mega-pixel (mp) camera as apposed to the K-5 which is a 16mp camera. Multiplying that by five photos per card would make a difference, not to mention the K-5 might have higher card writing speeds because it is newer.

Here is a list of the cards:
– Nokia 512MB Micro SD (from an old Nokia phone)
– pqi 4GB Class 2 Micro SDHC (from a junkie Cruz Reader Tablet)
– Samsung 2GB Micro SD (from my newest smart phone)
– Generic 8GB Class 2 Micro SDHC (from a refurbished smart phone I bought from ebay)
– Generic 2GB Micro SD (Bought this online retail years ago to use in a GPS when 2GB was large and expensive. There is good chance this is SanDisk or Crucial, but I can’t remember)
– Sandisk Extreme (HD Video) 8GB Class 10 SD (B&H was selling them for a good price)
– Transcend 16GB Class 10 SD (wanted more space for video work)
– Kingston 16GB 133X Compact Flash (bought for the Pentax *ist D camera)

The results as screen-shots of the Ubuntu disk utility benchmark:

Nokia 512MB Micro SD

Kingston 16GB 133X CF

Generic 2GB Micro SD

Transcend 16GB Class 10 SD

Sandisk Extreme 8GB Class 10 SD

Samsung 2GB Micro SD

pqi 4GB Class 2 Micro SDHC

Generic 8GB Class 2 Micro SDHC


Here are the maximum, minimum, and average write speeds for all of the cards (as well as average access time):

Minimum Write Rate in MBps / Maximum Write Rate in MBps / Average Write Rate in MBps / Average Access Time in Milliseconds

  • Nokia 512MB Micro SD = 3.0 / 4.9 / 4.7 / 1.5
  • pqi 4GB Class 2 Micro SDHC = 0.97 / 8.4 / 2.3 / 1.4
  • Samsung 2GB Micro SD = 1.6 / 6.4 / 4.0 / 3.1
  • Generic 8GB Class 2 Micro SDHC = -1 / -1 / -1 / -1
  • Generic 2GB Micro SD = 3.1 / 8.8 / 6.0 / 1.2
  • Sandisk Extreme 8GB Class 10 SD = 2.4 / 15.8 / 6.6 / 1.7
  • Transcend 16GB Class 10 SD = 2.5 / 11.2 / 3.2 / 1.7
  • Kingston 16GB 133X CF = 4.3 / 11.8 / 8.0 / 1.4

So what do we generally get from the test? Don’t buy a large off-brand card because you want a large amount of space yet want to save money. That generic 8GB micro SD card wouldn’t even complete the test. We also see the compact flash card is around the same write speed as the fastest SD cards, but has a very high read rate (maxing out USB 2.0 bandwidth most likely). The Sandisk Extreme SD card seems like it would be the best card for cameras because it has a very high maximum write rate and a good average rate.

After the standard benchmark, I composed a video to demonstrate actual write times for each card in a DSLR camera (a Pentax K-7):
The camera was set to a 5-frame bracket mode of 14 mega-pixel RAW files, which should total around 75 mega-bytes.

Here are the approximate write times for each card:


Approximate time in seconds to write 5 RAW frames (75MB).
  • Nokia 512MB Micro SD = 20
  • pqi 4GB Class 2 Micro SDHC = 19
  • Samsung 2GB Micro SD = 11
  • Generic 8GB Class 2 Micro SDHC = 21
  • Generic 2GB Micro SD = 13
  • Sandisk Extreme 8GB Class 10 SD = 4
  • Transcend 16GB Class 10 SD = 4
  • Kingston 16GB 133X CF = NA

Final thoughts:

  • The SanDisk Extreme 8GB SD cards and the Transcend 16GB cards are around the same price. It’s up to you whether absolute speed or storage space is more important. I like both companies and think they offer a quality product from my past experiences with them. At least with my older K-7 camera the higher total speed of the SanDisk isn’t noticeable in a 5-frame bracket. More extensive testing would be required to see if there is a real-world difference.
  • Don’t buy or use cheap micro SD cards because you will pay dearly in performance. If you are in a pinch, they will work in a fashion. Say you ran out of memory card space on your main card and was able to use your phone’s card with an adapter you just happened to have in your camera bag or something…
  • An above average compact flash card has similar performance to one of the better SD cards available in the computer based test.
  • Older expensive cards are consistent with their performance. That 2GB micro SD card I remember paying a decent amount of money for isn’t too bad compared to the cheap junk ones I’ve acquired over the years bundled with devices. However the Samsung micro SD that came with my newest phone is alright. No match for a dedicated class 10 SD card though in real world performance.


Popular posts from this blog

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. Key Specifications:

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open Br

7Artisans 85mm f/1.8 for Nikon Z-mount Overview

Let's take a look at the 7Artisans 85mm f/1.8 for Nikon Z-mount and compare it to the official Nikon 85mm f/1.8s lens. 7Artisans sent me this lens, but had to agree to my collaboration terms . They had no say in any content I produced and were not allowed to preview anything. My  full video on YouTube Check the lens out through 7Artisans official website store: https://7artisans.store/products/af-85mm-f1-8-full-frame-lens-for-z I am not affiliated with their website and online shop. I make no commissions through them.  See the 7artisans Photoelectric 85mm f/1.8 AF Lens through my links: Amazon.com ebay.com B&H Photo Video Adorama.com As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!   Build Quality and Features The 7Artisans lens comes with a metal casing and a metal mount. It also has a USB port in the mount for potential future firmware updates. The Nikon lens is on the left. It's got a manual focus ring, an aperture ring, and a focus mode switch. The Ni