Skip to main content

Comparison: FA 31mm f1.8 Limited to DA 40mm f2.8 Limited

he question was brought up on Pentax Forums recently “Is the 31mm Limited really 2.8 times better than the 40mm Limited?” As you can guess, the debate has been raging on for many pages.

FA 31mm f1.8 Limited to DA 40mm f2.8 Limited together:


The 31mm and 30mm with a Canadian coin.


To start things off, that photo describes why I advocate buying both. While their usage can overlap, the sheer size difference puts them in different categories.

FA 31mm differences:
Almost the perfect general purpose lens with a very normal focal length in APS-C.
No quick-shift focus system is a pain sometimes.
Average sized and gives your left hand something to hold.
Wide aperture for background blur and low-light photography.
Big front element with the build in hood isn’t ideal for current Pentax DSLRs.
Has an aperture ring.
Front element and filter threads are a little different. Took me three tries to find a filter that I could safely use (Hoya HMC and S-HMC are good, I opted for a S-HMC with this lens). Many of the cheaper filters have the glass too close to the thread end, so the filter glass and the center of the front element on the 31mm would touch.
Less vignetting at f2.8 than the 40mm, even with a 9mm wider view.

DA 40mm differences:
  • 40mm on APS-C is a bit tight sometimes. My biggest issue.
  • Quick shift focus system is great.
  • Super small in size, which is usually good, but sometimes bad because there isn’t much for your left hand to hold.
  • Screw on lens hood is good and bad. I like how it protects the front element, but it takes a long time to screw on and off. Sometimes I use a plastic clip on lens cover from another lens.
  • No aperture ring.
  • Very low chromatic aberrations, less than the 31mm throughout the aperture range. 
How are they alike?
  • Produce (in the words of Steve Jobs) magical images, which are sharp and full of contrast.
  • Have solid metal construction.
  • Metal lens hoods and caps.
  • Have fast screw-drive auto-focus.
  • Should be able to cover full-frame cameras (DA 40mm referenced test on PF).
  • Have very minimal barrel distortion.
  • Don’t have weather resistance. The big image comparison:

FA 31mm f/5.6

FA 31mm f/1.8

FA 31mm f/5.6

FA 31mm f/2.8

FA 31mm f/16

FA 31mm f/1.8

FA 31mm f/2.8

FA 31mm f/16

DA 40mm f/2.8

DA 40mm f/5.6
DA 40mm f/16

DA 40mm f/16

Each lens was set to a range of aperture values, but the shutter speed and ISO were consistent between lenses/aperture values. All images were taken at ISO 400, so f16 required long shutter speeds. You can see all of that information in the EXIF of course.


In conclusion, when I want to one lens to do everything, I use the 31mm. When I want the smallest setup possible, I use the 40mm. I actually bought the 31mm after owning the 40mm for a few years. My justification on holding out was that that the 31mm is expensive, but I see now that it is worth the asking price. After owning both I have to say I never plan on selling either of them. They both have unique and useful qualities and are great photography tools.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. Check out the full video on YouTube:   The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the ...
Read more

7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 for Nikon Z-mount Overview

In this overview, I'm taking a look at the 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 lens for the Nikon Z system. Is it worth considering over the official Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8s lens? I also compare it with the Nikon Z 24-50mm f/4-6.3 kit lens at 50mm.  Check out the full video on YouTube :  7Artisans sent me this lens to try out based on my  collaboration terms . They had no say in the content produced and were not allowed to preview it.  Build Quality & Handling 7Artisans and Nikon lens side-by-side. The 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 is similar in size to Nikon's 50mm f/1.8s, although it's slightly taller and a bit thinner. Both lenses feature a manual/auto focus switch, but I found that the one on the 7Artisans lens requires less travel and is easier to push, which isn't ideal. You might accidentally switch modes while handling the lens. Something I found myself doing a couple of times on my photowalk. The AF/MF switch and aperture adjustment ring. The manual focus ring on the 7Artisans lens...
Read more

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Check out the YouTube video here : Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5m...
Read more