Skip to main content

Anime Milwaukee Convention Photos

I just recently spent a weekend in Wisconsin to take photos at an Anime convention. 

My standard setup for most of the convention: 

  • K-5 with the DA 14mm f2.8 around the neck.
  • K-7 with the DA* 55mm f1.4 in a camera bag.
  • So I would take a few frames with the K-7 (portrait) and then another few with the K-5 (fully body). The setup worked surprisingly well. If you spend any time reading my blog, you will know I prefer prime lenses, hence the two camera bodies. While primes are quite challenging, I feel they best fit my style a good deal of the time. 

Here are a few highlight images:







When I was going to a large sit-down event in the main programming room, I would switch to this setup in the meantime to take portraits:
K-7 with the FA 31mm f1.8 around the neck for people photos.
K-5 with the DA 50-200mm WR in a camera bag for the event.
That setup also worked nicely as the 31mm is a pretty great all-rounder lens. I can’t easily get full body shots, but it was “good enough.”

I had decided to forgo using flash just to see if I could manage image quality wise, and to avoid lugging around a camera with a flash and bracket. While fast glass isn’t a substitute (harsh indoor light sources are killer without fill flash), it worked pretty decently after seeing the final post-processed results.

The K-5 with the DA 50-200mm WR combo was surprisingly strong when dealing with a very large and dark room that had intense directional light covering an elevated stage. At times I was shooting in 12,800 ISO. I see the resulting images are quite serviceable with noise reduction software like Noise Ninja. Slow shutter camera blur was never a problem, although I was struggling with over-exposure…





    Popular posts from this blog

    First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

    I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...

    Canon M6 Mark II HDMI & 10-bit Output?

    I’m writing all of this down in case sources disappear and I want to reference M6ii HDMI-out information in the future.  Selecting clean HDMI from the settings. So this is not by any means a definitive source but rather a jumble of information I’m putting together in the moment. The “HDMI info disp” setting to select clean output mode. This camera's 4K isn't really that size internally, but better than 1080p at least. There is one webpage I know about that mentioned the Canon EOS M6 Mark II supports clean HDMI output in 10-bit 4:2:2. I don’t think the page exists any longer on Canon USA’s website because the old link no longer works after a redesign. https://youtu.be/_UT9u0XVn5U However it does currently exist on the Internet Archive .   A screen capture from the  Internet Archive  webpage copy. Here’s the important quote from that webpage:  HDMI recording: Menu-selected user choices for HDMI output with info (images recorded to the SD card); Clean 4K output, or...

    Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

    A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm...