Skip to main content

What if you were in control of the Pentax lens lineup?

While I don’t know if my ideas would be good from a business standpoint, this is how I would set things up. I think having three very well structured and defined tiers would best help users understand what they are buying. The Pentax lineup as it stands at the moment is fragmented with too many naming conventions and no well defined tiers besides the DA* line to everything else.

High Tier (All lenses would be WR):

  • Phase out DA* name and downgrade the APS-C only DA* glass such as the 16-50mm 2.8 and 50-135mm 2.8 to the middle tier (Other DA* are OK in FF!). Do not use the * (star) designator anymore. People outside of the Pentax realm usually seem to have no idea how to pronounce the “*” symbol…
  • Take FA capable DA* lenses and call them D-FA SDM WR Limited. Make sure there is a full range of D-FA SDM Limited zooms available for advanced users.
  • Take the FA Limiteds and DA Limiteds that are FA capable and make them WR. Call them D-FA WR Limited.
  • All must include weather resistance (WR), quick-shift, metal lens mount, and hood.
  • Lenses would mostly be internal focus, and preferably internal zooming to allow for better weather resistance.
  • High-end materials and craftsmanship only.
  • SDM lenses in this tier will have strong, fast, and reliable motor systems only.
  • Premium product with a similarly premium price.

Lenses must be named with:
** D-FA SDM WR Limited ** (FF)
** D-FA WR Limited ** (FF)

——————————————————–

Middle Tier (All lenses would be WR):

  • Get more D-FA WR lenses out the door. Use classic designs that were well regarded and give them the same treatment as the 100mm WR Macro basically. Keep them under the price range of D-FA (SDM) Limiteds in the top tier.
  • Move FA capable DA Limited designs to the high tier as defined above. Cheapen APS-C only limiteds to the level of the 100mm WR Macro, but add WR ability.
  • Mid range zoom lenses like the new 18-135mm WR lens, however these should be fixed F4 or faster unless the type of lens warrants a slower aperture, otherwise they should be in the lower tier.
  • All must include weather resistance (WR), quick-shift, metal lens mount, and hood.

Lenses must be named with:
** D-FA WR ** (FF)
** DA WR ** (APS-C)
** DA SDM WR ** (APS-C)

——————————————————–

Low Tier:

  • Call all lenses in this range DA-L allowing users to know exactly what they are getting.
  • I think the new 35mm f2.4 prime fits perfectly in this tier. The specifications and price are just as I would define them.
  • Plastic body and lens mount.
  • Cheap in overall price, yet decent optics if possible.
  • APS-C coverage only.
  • Phase out all lenses like the non-WR 18-55mm.
  • Screwdrive or DC motor, whichever is cheaper to manufacture.
  • No weather resistance.

Lenses must be named with:
** DA-L ** (APS-C)

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. Check out the full video on YouTube:   The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the ...
Read more

7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 for Nikon Z-mount Overview

In this overview, I'm taking a look at the 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 lens for the Nikon Z system. Is it worth considering over the official Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8s lens? I also compare it with the Nikon Z 24-50mm f/4-6.3 kit lens at 50mm.  Check out the full video on YouTube :  7Artisans sent me this lens to try out based on my  collaboration terms . They had no say in the content produced and were not allowed to preview it.  Build Quality & Handling 7Artisans and Nikon lens side-by-side. The 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 is similar in size to Nikon's 50mm f/1.8s, although it's slightly taller and a bit thinner. Both lenses feature a manual/auto focus switch, but I found that the one on the 7Artisans lens requires less travel and is easier to push, which isn't ideal. You might accidentally switch modes while handling the lens. Something I found myself doing a couple of times on my photowalk. The AF/MF switch and aperture adjustment ring. The manual focus ring on the 7Artisans lens...
Read more

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Check out the YouTube video here : Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5m...
Read more