Skip to main content

What if you were in control of the Pentax lens lineup?

While I don’t know if my ideas would be good from a business standpoint, this is how I would set things up. I think having three very well structured and defined tiers would best help users understand what they are buying. The Pentax lineup as it stands at the moment is fragmented with too many naming conventions and no well defined tiers besides the DA* line to everything else.

High Tier (All lenses would be WR):

  • Phase out DA* name and downgrade the APS-C only DA* glass such as the 16-50mm 2.8 and 50-135mm 2.8 to the middle tier (Other DA* are OK in FF!). Do not use the * (star) designator anymore. People outside of the Pentax realm usually seem to have no idea how to pronounce the “*” symbol…
  • Take FA capable DA* lenses and call them D-FA SDM WR Limited. Make sure there is a full range of D-FA SDM Limited zooms available for advanced users.
  • Take the FA Limiteds and DA Limiteds that are FA capable and make them WR. Call them D-FA WR Limited.
  • All must include weather resistance (WR), quick-shift, metal lens mount, and hood.
  • Lenses would mostly be internal focus, and preferably internal zooming to allow for better weather resistance.
  • High-end materials and craftsmanship only.
  • SDM lenses in this tier will have strong, fast, and reliable motor systems only.
  • Premium product with a similarly premium price.

Lenses must be named with:
** D-FA SDM WR Limited ** (FF)
** D-FA WR Limited ** (FF)

——————————————————–

Middle Tier (All lenses would be WR):

  • Get more D-FA WR lenses out the door. Use classic designs that were well regarded and give them the same treatment as the 100mm WR Macro basically. Keep them under the price range of D-FA (SDM) Limiteds in the top tier.
  • Move FA capable DA Limited designs to the high tier as defined above. Cheapen APS-C only limiteds to the level of the 100mm WR Macro, but add WR ability.
  • Mid range zoom lenses like the new 18-135mm WR lens, however these should be fixed F4 or faster unless the type of lens warrants a slower aperture, otherwise they should be in the lower tier.
  • All must include weather resistance (WR), quick-shift, metal lens mount, and hood.

Lenses must be named with:
** D-FA WR ** (FF)
** DA WR ** (APS-C)
** DA SDM WR ** (APS-C)

——————————————————–

Low Tier:

  • Call all lenses in this range DA-L allowing users to know exactly what they are getting.
  • I think the new 35mm f2.4 prime fits perfectly in this tier. The specifications and price are just as I would define them.
  • Plastic body and lens mount.
  • Cheap in overall price, yet decent optics if possible.
  • APS-C coverage only.
  • Phase out all lenses like the non-WR 18-55mm.
  • Screwdrive or DC motor, whichever is cheaper to manufacture.
  • No weather resistance.

Lenses must be named with:
** DA-L ** (APS-C)

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...
Read more

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm...
Read more

Nikon Z Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 Lens Review

Here’s my full video review of the the Nikon 28mm f/2.8 lens where I talk about using it with a Nikon Z5 camera at multiple conventions, events, and even nature photography.  Nikon Z 28mm f/2.8 Overall, it’s a reasonable option if you are on a budget and want a larger aperture range plus internal focus compared to the kit lens. https://youtu.be/9ECYPd4L2Yg Check out the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 Lens through my affiliate links: Amazon B&H Photo Video Adorama Best Buy ebay Used on KEH Walmart As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases! The 28mm on a Nikon Z5 camera body. This lens is compact and has the build quality of their NIKKOR Z 24-50mm f/4-6.3 kit lens so that means a plastic mount. Not ideal, but feels sufficient enough. Don’t expect weather resistance from this lens as there is no back gasket. What the lens would look like in the two Z sensor formats. Besides the convenient and compact size, I like that the lens is completely internal focus. Thei...
Read more