Skip to main content

Pro-Gaff, 3M, and AmazonBasics No Residue Tape Overview

In this article I talk about gaffer tape as well as no-residue duct tape. I have used tapes like this for years and it's tough using anything else because of how versatile it is. 

Check out the related video on YouTube:

The first one we are talking about today is Pro Tapes Gaff. This is a traditional gaffer tape that's meant to not to leave a residue as well as being easy to tear. If you are in some type of video production situation, you typically use this type of tape to put over cables or other obstacles on set. 

I do not do professional video production, but I do use this type of tape a lot in just almost any situation related to my online video work. 


Is all gaffer tape the same?

I had used a roll of Amazon Basics gaffer tap. The nice thing about this tape was that it did not have a white backing, which made it look cleaner on the edges, but it failed at being no residue for extended periods of time. They do mention on the product page it's not intended for long term use, so I guess it shouldn't have been much of a surprise. Also, this tape is especially bad with heat which probably the main issue. 

Amazon Basics gaffers tape

An example of Amazon Basics gaffer tape leaving a residue after sitting on this microphone for a long time. The residue was completely dry and embedded into the mic.

Gaffer tape is distinct from duct tape largely due to the adhesive used. Duct tape typically uses a natural rubber adhesive which is aggressive and prone to oxidizing or melting into a sticky goo over time. True gaffer tape uses a synthetic petroleum-based adhesive designed to withstand heat and be removed cleanly without damaging the surface or leaving residue behind. -Definition generated by Gemini Pro 3

 

An Alternative: 3M No Residue Duct Tape

As an alternative, I have used this 3M No Residue tape. This is my favorite general utility tape.

A roll of 3M No Residue Duct Tape which has a shiny gray finish.

The main issues with this one is that it is shiny, gray, and doesn't tear quit as easily as the Pro-Gaff. I wish they had different options for this tape but it is solid functionally. I have used it in many situations where it stayed on surfaces for years and didn't have an issue. Of course, that will depend on heat and other environmental aspects like that. 

Peeling back a strip of the 3M tape, revealing the white backing material on the underside.

This one also has a white backing. It tears, but not as easily as the Gaff tape. If you tear it by hand, you can see that white edge even more. 


Testing Pro-Gaff

Pro-Gaff is a better option than the 3M duct tape for camera gear because of the black matte finish. I had covered that residue that the Amazon Basics tape had left on my microphone with this tape and the white edges are not very noticeable when you cut it instead of tear it. 

Placing a strip of black Pro-Gaff tape over the Nikon logo on the camera viewfinder hump.

Covering camera logos is something that people like to do. It depends on your personal preferences, but I think it is nice to do sometimes when you don't want bright white text distracting our subject. Or if you are outdoors and want something a little bit less noticeable. Gaffer tape is pretty much the only option since it has that matte finish and doesn't leave a residue usually. 

I also use it for practical protection. If you don't have a hot shoe cover or lost it, and you are going into a dusty situation, you can easily use this tape instead. 

Another good option would be to put a ring of tape around the lens and camera mount area if you are going into a wet environment as a temporary seal in addition to any other precautions you'd take. 


The camera's hot shoe contacts covered with a piece of black gaffer tape for protection.

One thing I noticed with this Pro-Gaff is that when I do tear it instead of cutting it, it leaves a string of material sometimes. You can pull that off from the other side, but at least something to know about. Cutting it is generally the best option for clean application with as little of the adhesive side being seen. 

Close-up of a lens barrel where a torn piece of tape was applied, showing a slightly frayed edge.


Labeling and Storage

If you want to label your stuff, gaff tape plus a marker that works with the specific tape is a good idea.

The back of a game controller with a piece of tape labeled 'Scott' using a gold sharpie marker.

One additional thing I do with this type of tape is that I don't use it very quickly, and I want to keep it in good condition, so I put it in a Ziploc bag.

Placing the large roll of Pro-Gaff tape inside a clear plastic Ziploc bag for storage.

I don't know if it is necessary or even helps, but that is what I do and it seems to be keeping these useful longer. It has a bit of an adhesive smell, so that is another reason I put it in the bag. It is expensive, so I try to use it only when I need it. 

A look inside the core of the Pro-Gaff tape roll showing the manufacturer branding.

Check out ProTapes Pro Gaff Premium Matte Cloth Gaffer's Tape: 

3M No-Residue Duct Tape: 

Amazon Basics Gaffers Tape: 

As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases! Usually anything purchased within 24 hours of the visit. It doesn't have to be the products I linked. 


Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. Check out the full video on YouTube:   The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the ...

7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 for Nikon Z-mount Overview

In this overview, I'm taking a look at the 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 lens for the Nikon Z system. Is it worth considering over the official Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8s lens? I also compare it with the Nikon Z 24-50mm f/4-6.3 kit lens at 50mm.  Check out the full video on YouTube :  7Artisans sent me this lens to try out based on my  collaboration terms . They had no say in the content produced and were not allowed to preview it.  Build Quality & Handling 7Artisans and Nikon lens side-by-side. The 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 is similar in size to Nikon's 50mm f/1.8s, although it's slightly taller and a bit thinner. Both lenses feature a manual/auto focus switch, but I found that the one on the 7Artisans lens requires less travel and is easier to push, which isn't ideal. You might accidentally switch modes while handling the lens. Something I found myself doing a couple of times on my photowalk. The AF/MF switch and aperture adjustment ring. The manual focus ring on the 7Artisans lens...

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Check out the YouTube video here : Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5m...