Skip to main content

Photo Walk: 7Artisans 18mm f/6.3 vs. EF-M 11-22mm in a Japanese Garden

I've had this recording on my work drive for many years at this point. I went to a beautiful Japanese garden, used these lenses, and took some photos. The video is about the lenses, but also about the type of photography and the ways that I use the lenses. 

Watch the video on YouTube here.

First off, we have the 7Artisans 18mm f/6.3. This lens has a fixed aperture and is very compact. It's a really nice combination with the M6 Mark II or any small camera. This APS-C only lens will not cover a full-frame imaging circle besides the fact it's EF-M mount which never had larger than APS-C sensors. 

A view of the Japanese Garden with the Canon EOS M6 Mark II, ready to shoot.

The 7Artisans 18mm F6.3 lens, very compact.

It's basically a body cap lens. The main consideration, and actually the main downside of this lens, is its fixed focus, with what they'd probably call "acceptable focus" at 0.35 meters (13.77 inches). This is limiting, especially with the style of photography I did here. Even so, it's a pretty nice combination just based on size.

Webpage for the 7Artisans 18mm F6.3 lens.

On their website, 7Artisans makes a few interesting comments. It is widely used as a "in humanity lens" and has a "Biscuit Head" design, lol. It's a pretty fun lens to use, very simple, very to the point. You only have to adjust shutter speed and ISO, with that fixed aperture and fixed focus.

Example photo, taken with the 7Artisans 18mm, showing pathway in the garden.

There were quite a few times in this photo walk that I was too close to the intended subject. It looks so out of focus that it destroys the photo. You can consider using some type of macro extension tubes to get closer. Landscape photos at a distance can work out nicely. Considering what it is, and the price, it's decent for those situations.

Landscape photo with the 7Artisans, demonstrating a fair amount of detail.

You will get color fringing on edges especially, but there is a fair amount of detail. And the M6 Mark II is a high-resolution camera, so not too bad. 

Waterfall photo using the 7Artisans lens, capturing the subject well.

The waterfall photos with this lens are good. A mix of decent framing captures that subject well.

The 7Artisans at its worst.

This lens does not handle flare well at all. You might have to block light with your hand, or position yourself to stop it from happening.

Some of the fish photos turned out really nice. 

Koi fish photo, showcasing the 7Artisans lens' ability in certain situations.

A lot of the photos I did use the EF-M 11 to 22mm lens.

Switching to the EF-M 11-22mm lens on the Canon EOS M6 Mark II.

The main downside of this lens, clearly, is the aperture range at f/4 to 5.6. It does have stabilization, so that's a nice benefit. But in this specific instance, it's just fine.

Even this limited zoom range does have benefits to the photography. You can capture subjects in different ways with that mix of 11 or 22mm, and in between if you want to do that.

The Canon zoom lens at its widest.

This lens excels at getting close up to subjects while still having a wide-angle look. I really like that aspect of the lens. I do miss it. There were a lot of nice benefits to the lens. You can capture a lot while having a somewhat intimate feel to the images.

Using the sun with this lens at the edges of the frame, usually, that adds a nice look. It has those beams of light coming in. Works out well. Nice, unique, punchy images. Also works with leaves.

Overall, a fun photo walk with these two lenses. I think either one would be nice to walk around, take some pictures, whatever you want to do. It's not always about perfect image quality, enjoy your hobby.

I don't have any of this equipment anymore. I did really enjoy the M6 Mark II for various reasons. 

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. Check out the full video on YouTube:   The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the ...

7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 for Nikon Z-mount Overview

In this overview, I'm taking a look at the 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 lens for the Nikon Z system. Is it worth considering over the official Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8s lens? I also compare it with the Nikon Z 24-50mm f/4-6.3 kit lens at 50mm.  Check out the full video on YouTube :  7Artisans sent me this lens to try out based on my  collaboration terms . They had no say in the content produced and were not allowed to preview it.  Build Quality & Handling 7Artisans and Nikon lens side-by-side. The 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 is similar in size to Nikon's 50mm f/1.8s, although it's slightly taller and a bit thinner. Both lenses feature a manual/auto focus switch, but I found that the one on the 7Artisans lens requires less travel and is easier to push, which isn't ideal. You might accidentally switch modes while handling the lens. Something I found myself doing a couple of times on my photowalk. The AF/MF switch and aperture adjustment ring. The manual focus ring on the 7Artisans lens...

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Check out the YouTube video here : Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5m...