Skip to main content

Viltrox UV PRO MC HT Filter Overview and Test

Let's take a look at the Viltrox UV Pro MC HT filter. Viltrox had to agree to my collaboration terms before I accepted the product. 

See the related video for more information


Check out the lens on their official store: 

https://viltrox.com/products/viltrox-ultra-slim-mc-uv-protection-filter 

I'm not an affiliate of their store and make no commissions from purchases there. This is intentional and based on my collaboration rules I've defined for myself. 

Visit my affiliates to see the filters as well: 

As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases! 

The Viltrox filter with it's included case. There's a paper manual behind the foam.

Viltrox claims that it has high transmittance, featuring a UV cut at 395nm. With a single-sided reflectance within the visible spectrum of below 0.3%. That’s supposed to minimize any impact on image quality, which is always a concern with filters.

Texturing on the exterior surface is good for removal.

The filter's design is a little different than what I’m used to. The texturing on the side is a nice touch. It should make removal easier. 

The Waka and Promaster filters compared to the Viltrox.

In comparison, some of my older filters don’t have that texturing, and I’ve found them a bit more difficult to handle. It’s still a thin filter overall, which is important to limit the chance of vignetting on wide angle lenses. 

I use UV filters to avoid having to deal with lens caps.

I like using UV filters. While some people avoid them due to the potential for affecting image quality, I prefer the convenience. With a filter on, I don’t have to worry as much about using a lens cap or damaging the front element of the lens. It’s much easier and less of a concern when cleaning a filter than the actual lens front element.

You can see a lot more bloom with the Waka filter and the Promaster has a green reflection toward the bottom of the image.

I did a quick comparison test with the Viltrox filter alongside a Promaster MC UV filter and a Waka Ultra Slim MC UV filter. Honestly, I wasn’t expecting to see much of a difference considering the other two filters have multi-coatings, but the results surprised me. The Waka filter had a noticeable bloom effect, which is light that was coming through the edges more than it should, and it lost contrast as a result. 

Even the Promaster filter showed some loss of contrast when compared to the Viltrox in addition to a strong green reflection toward the bottom of the image related to the Promaster's coatings. 

The difference is clearly noticeable when zoomed in.

In this tests, the Viltrox definitely performed the best. It retained more contrast and I didn't see any reflections like on the Promaster. This was particularly noticeable when zooming into the images. I don't remember how much the Promaster filter cost, but the Waka was definitely the cheapest of the three. In this case I guess you get what you pay for. 

I didn’t expect such a clear difference between the filters, but the Viltrox filter outperformed the others in terms of maintaining contrast with a bright light in the frame. I was genuinely impressed by the optical performance in that quick test. 

The three filters tested.

So, in conclusion, if you're looking for a 67mm UV filter that minimizes impact on image quality, the Viltrox VR Pro MC HT is worth considering. The build quality is solid, and in my experience, it delivers better contrast than some other filters I’ve used. 


Popular posts from this blog

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. K...

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm...