Skip to main content

Nikon Z50 II has been announced.

The original Nikon Z50 was released in 2019. What does the Nikon Z50 II offer compared to the original after 5 years? Let's take a look! 

The Z50 II with a kit lens.


I haven't used the Z50 II camera. This is mostly a dive into specifications. I have tried the original Z50. Even back then it felt a bit quirky in some aspects, but overall a decent camera. 

A few references:

The top of the camera. Notice the button below ISO. That's for picture control. 

Check out the camera through my affiliate links: 
As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!

The good (most of these copied from Nikon's global website):

  • Fully articulating screen similar to what is on the Z30 and Zfc.
  • Tally light on the front of the camera. 
  • Pop-up flash for people that want it. 
  • The EN-EL25a battery was slightly upgraded.
  • Autofocus improvements with 9 different subject types inherited from the Z9 and Z8.
  • 1.0-cm/0.39-in., 2.3M dot (XGA) OLED electronic viewfinder.
  • Pre-Release Capture at up to 30 fps allows capture up to 1 second before fully pressing the shutter release button.
  • Video recoding options like 5.6K oversampled to 4K 10-bit H.265 N-Log. In addition to full HD/120p in 10-bit H.265.
  • Video features including Hi-Res Zoom, and N-Log/HLG support, and waveforms.
  • Enhanced camera responsiveness in Auto shooting mode from Nikon's "unique AI deep learning technology".
  • Seamless switching between portrait and landscape shooting with an adaptive vertical UI display for stills.
  • Nikon Imaging Cloud enables image transfer without the need for a computer and offers download of Imaging Recipes. 
  • The memory card slot was updated to UHS-II.

The Nikon:

  • A dedicated button for one-touch access to Imaging Recipes and Picture Controls. Are people really using the old picture controls: Denim, Toy, Sepia, Blue, Red, Pink, Charcoal, Graphite, Binary, Carbon and such? They should get rid of those considering they should be able to be mimicked with the new recipe feature. 
  • Nikon Z cameras all have generally nice build quality. Even the Z30 which tends to be the cheapest Z camera at the moment.
  • Full separation of photography and video with a toggle switch. 
  • On screen information changes with physical orientation of the camera. 
  • It looks like they stopped including a charger. From the global website: EN-EL25a Rechargeable Li-ion Battery, AN-DC29 Strap, UC-E25 USB Cable, BF-N1 Body Cap. 
  • Somewhat open yet still restricted Z mount in regard to native autofocus lenses. At least Sigma has offered a few APS-C lenses. Oddly enough Nikon seem more open about APS-C than full-frame, which benefits the Z50 II.

The fully articulating screen like the Nikon Z30 and Zfc have.


The not so good: 

  • Likely the same sensor and related readout performance as the original Z50. They are also oversampling from 5.6k for video now, which likely increases rolling shutter issues. But you will get more detail. Pure speculation on my part without out any data to back it up. 
  • No internal sensor based stabilization. 
  • 1/4000th of a second maximum mechanical shutter speed. 
  • EN-EL25 series battery. I don't know why camera companies insist on having a separate battery for their lower-end cameras. The should use the larger battery in all of their cameras that are not compacts. 
  • One memory card slot. 
  • Lower resolution 2.36M dot EVF that looks physically small. 
  • Not much cheaper than the Nikon Z5 as it's often available for around $1000. 
  • 4k 60fps has large a crop. Considering the processing improvements, this is probably due to the sensor itself. 

My opinion on the camera and its features:

In practice, the improvements in processing technology should make for a noticeable benefit in use of the camera for photography and videography. The downside is that with the same sensor there is only so much they can do considering readout performance. It's difficult to find rolling shutter tests for the original Z50 and so far I haven't seen a single test on the Z50 II, so speculation on my part.  

The viewfinder eye relief was reduced. For people with large noses this looks like a downgrade. Overall the viewfinder on the camera seems low-end compared to a camera like the Z5. 

One of their official videos shows the camera flash being used in a restaurant. These days I think a mix of technology and processing should help avoid the need for a flash. I think the production cost for a built-in flash should have been put somewhere else. 

The state of APS-C cameras isn't great in general. Sony only started refreshing their lineup with a faster read-out 26 MP sensor where the cheapest one is the ZV-E10 II that is video focused. 

The 24 MP sensor used in cameras like the Sony a6100, a6400, and ZV-E10 is worse than the sensor in the Nikon. 

Canon also had a fair amount of APS-C bodies at this point. The R50 is under $700 and covers a lot of what the Nikon does. 

I'm not knowledgeable about Fujifilm, but I'm going to assume they have a ton of options available. On B&H it looks like the cheapest new camera is the X-M5 right now at $800 which is prerelease. They also have the X-T30 II very close in price to the Z50 II.  

It's going to be a fine camera for Nikon, but there is a lot of competition and I'm doubtful it's going to be a camera that will motivate a lot of people to consider Nikon. With a camera like the Z5 they managed to have a good mix of features like dual card slots and a good viewfinder comparatively to other manufacturers. For the Z50 II I'm not sure it's as strong of a deal. Had they done something like integrate IBIS into the camera for $1000, I think it would have been a hot seller. 



Popular posts from this blog

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. K...

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm...