Skip to main content

Nikon Z50 II has been announced.

The original Nikon Z50 was released in 2019. What does the Nikon Z50 II offer compared to the original after 5 years? Let's take a look! 

The Z50 II with a kit lens.


I haven't used the Z50 II camera. This is mostly a dive into specifications. I have tried the original Z50. Even back then it felt a bit quirky in some aspects, but overall a decent camera. 

A few references:

The top of the camera. Notice the button below ISO. That's for picture control. 

The good (most of these copied from Nikon's global website):

  • Fully articulating screen similar to what is on the Z30 and Zfc.
  • Tally light on the front of the camera. 
  • Pop-up flash for people that want it. 
  • The EN-EL25a battery was slightly upgraded.
  • Autofocus improvements with 9 different subject types inherited from the Z9 and Z8.
  • 1.0-cm/0.39-in., 2.3M dot (XGA) OLED electronic viewfinder.
  • Pre-Release Capture at up to 30 fps allows capture up to 1 second before fully pressing the shutter release button.
  • Video recoding options like 5.6K oversampled to 4K 10-bit H.265 N-Log. In addition to full HD/120p in 10-bit H.265.
  • Video features including Hi-Res Zoom, and N-Log/HLG support, and waveforms.
  • Enhanced camera responsiveness in Auto shooting mode from Nikon's "unique AI deep learning technology".
  • Seamless switching between portrait and landscape shooting with an adaptive vertical UI display for stills.
  • Nikon Imaging Cloud enables image transfer without the need for a computer and offers download of Imaging Recipes. 
  • The memory card slot was updated to UHS-II.

The Nikon:

  • A dedicated button for one-touch access to Imaging Recipes and Picture Controls. Are people really using the old picture controls: Denim, Toy, Sepia, Blue, Red, Pink, Charcoal, Graphite, Binary, Carbon and such? They should get rid of those considering they should be able to be mimicked with the new recipe feature. 
  • Nikon Z cameras all have generally nice build quality. Even the Z30 which tends to be the cheapest Z camera at the moment.
  • Full separation of photography and video with a toggle switch. 
  • On screen information changes with physical orientation of the camera. 
  • It looks like they stopped including a charger. From the global website: EN-EL25a Rechargeable Li-ion Battery, AN-DC29 Strap, UC-E25 USB Cable, BF-N1 Body Cap. 
  • Somewhat open yet still restricted Z mount in regard to native autofocus lenses. At least Sigma has offered a few APS-C lenses. Oddly enough Nikon seem more open about APS-C than full-frame, which benefits the Z50 II.

The fully articulating screen like the Nikon Z30 and Zfc have.


The not so good: 

  • Likely the same sensor and related readout performance as the original Z50. They are also oversampling from 5.6k for video now, which likely increases rolling shutter issues. But you will get more detail. Pure speculation on my part without out any data to back it up. 
  • No internal sensor based stabilization. 
  • 1/4000th of a second maximum mechanical shutter speed. 
  • EN-EL25 series battery. I don't know why camera companies insist on having a separate battery for their lower-end cameras. The should use the larger battery in all of their cameras that are not compacts. 
  • One memory card slot. 
  • Lower resolution 2.36M dot EVF that looks physically small. 
  • Not much cheaper than the Nikon Z5 as it's often available for around $1000. 
  • 4k 60fps has large a crop. Considering the processing improvements, this is probably due to the sensor itself. 

My opinion on the camera and its features:

In practice, the improvements in processing technology should make for a noticeable benefit in use of the camera for photography and videography. The downside is that with the same sensor there is only so much they can do considering readout performance. It's difficult to find rolling shutter tests for the original Z50 and so far I haven't seen a single test on the Z50 II, so speculation on my part.  

The viewfinder eye relief was reduced. For people with large noses this looks like a downgrade. Overall the viewfinder on the camera seems low-end compared to a camera like the Z5. 

One of their official videos shows the camera flash being used in a restaurant. These days I think a mix of technology and processing should help avoid the need for a flash. I think the production cost for a built-in flash should have been put somewhere else. 

The state of APS-C cameras isn't great in general. Sony only started refreshing their lineup with a faster read-out 26 MP sensor where the cheapest one is the ZV-E10 II that is video focused. 

The 24 MP sensor used in cameras like the Sony a6100, a6400, and ZV-E10 is worse than the sensor in the Nikon. 

Canon also had a fair amount of APS-C bodies at this point. The R50 is under $700 and covers a lot of what the Nikon does. 

I'm not knowledgeable about Fujifilm, but I'm going to assume they have a ton of options available. On B&H it looks like the cheapest new camera is the X-M5 right now at $800 which is prerelease. They also have the X-T30 II very close in price to the Z50 II.  

It's going to be a fine camera for Nikon, but there is a lot of competition and I'm doubtful it's going to be a camera that will motivate a lot of people to consider Nikon. With a camera like the Z5 they managed to have a good mix of features like dual card slots and a good viewfinder comparatively to other manufacturers. For the Z50 II I'm not sure it's as strong of a deal. Had they done something like integrate IBIS into the camera for $1000, I think it would have been a hot seller. 


Check out the camera through my affiliate links: 

As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!


Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. Check out the full video on YouTube:   The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the ...
Read more

7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 for Nikon Z-mount Overview

In this overview, I'm taking a look at the 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 lens for the Nikon Z system. Is it worth considering over the official Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8s lens? I also compare it with the Nikon Z 24-50mm f/4-6.3 kit lens at 50mm.  Check out the full video on YouTube :  7Artisans sent me this lens to try out based on my  collaboration terms . They had no say in the content produced and were not allowed to preview it.  Build Quality & Handling 7Artisans and Nikon lens side-by-side. The 7Artisans 50mm f/1.8 is similar in size to Nikon's 50mm f/1.8s, although it's slightly taller and a bit thinner. Both lenses feature a manual/auto focus switch, but I found that the one on the 7Artisans lens requires less travel and is easier to push, which isn't ideal. You might accidentally switch modes while handling the lens. Something I found myself doing a couple of times on my photowalk. The AF/MF switch and aperture adjustment ring. The manual focus ring on the 7Artisans lens...
Read more

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Check out the YouTube video here : Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5m...
Read more