Skip to main content

Buying from Used Photo Pro, how was it? Sony E 16-70mm f/4 Overview

In this article I unbox and give first impressions of the Sony 16-70mm F4 OSS Lens from "Used Photo Pro" which is part of Robert's camera based in Indianapolis Indiana. 

The lens that I bought from UsedPhotoPro for the video.


Unboxing the Lens

UsedPhotoPro packed it well with plenty of paper padding, and bubble wrap. The lens itself was wrapped in a plastic bag with a rubber band to hold it flush. No complaints! 

The lens and some of the paper packaging below it.

First Look at the Lens

UPP's "Good" rating details as of the publishing of this article.

They had the lens rated as "Good" (75 to 89 percent). The zoom ring feels pretty smooth, but the focus ring is a tiny bit loose. It could be how the lens is normally. Totally fine though I might as well mention it. The lens feels within their rating description. 


Worn text "Steady Shot" on the bottom.


Non-vital text on the lens is a little worn, which is probably one of the main reasons why this lens was rated lower on their condition scale. I personally don't mind that and see price as the major factor to consider above cosmetics. 

It came with a third-party front cap and an official Sony rear cap. Overall, the lens looks good from the back, and the glass is clean. For the price of around $300 shipped, I think it was a decent deal. 


The glass is in good condition.


Comparing this Sony 16-70mm f/4 to the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8

On the Sony a7S I tested it in both APS-C mode and full-frame mode. 

There’s an obvious difference in exposure, f/4 on the Sony versus f/2.8 on the Sigma. I bumped the ISO up from 640 to 1000 when switching to the Sony lens to get them looking similar. The background won’t look quite as nice with the f/4 lens, but I can still get a decent look from either lens. 

The clear benefit of the Sigma lens is its maximum aperture.

The two lenses at their maximum apertures after ISO adjustment. Looks like I didn't get the ISO change correct, but you get the point. 

I did notice that there’s a little less distortion on the Sony at its widest setting compared to the Sigma, which is a nice benefit. Plus, the Sony has built-in optical stabilization, something the Sigma doesn’t offer. However, the Sigma lens lets me get closer. Tasks I do like showing products on camera makes that useful.

Thoughts on UsedPhotoPro

I’ve used UsedPhotoPro before, and have had positive experiences overall with them.

The deal seemed good enough I rushed to buy the lens. I wasn't intending to order an APS-C lens and was thinking the focal length range could apply with lenses like the Tamron 17-50mm f/4 Di III VXD that exist. Their website didn’t have an option to cancel the order. Since it was a weekend, I wasn’t able to get in touch with them after sending a message through their website and an email. The did respond on a weekday, but the lens had already been sent.

Considering it was my mistake and any equipment I have access to for review to is useful to my work, so I’ll probably keep it for a while. If I'm able to get an FX30 in the future this would be a nice combination.

Final Thoughts

The Sony 16-70mm F4 OSS appears to be a nice lens in my limited testing. If you need optical stabilization or want that extra zoom range compared to the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8, it's an option to consider.

If you’re more interested in a faster aperture, then the Sigma f/2.8 might be the better choice. I also think the Sigma's autofocus motor is a bit better for video work than the Sony's.

Both lenses have their pros and cons, but either one would make a good addition to your kit depending on your needs.


Check out their website UsedPhotoPro.com to see what gear they currently have available.

The link is not affiliated. I used to be an affiliate of UsedPhotoPro, but that ended when CJ Affiliates kept closing my account due to what they claimed as inactivity and taking whatever commissions I had built up each time. If you are reading this UPP, use a different company to manage your affiliate program. CJ Affiliate (aka. "Commission Junction") is a scummy company with policies that hurt creators with lower reach. An alternative would be Impact.com.

Check out the full video on YouTube:

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the sensor. The Z5ii gets a backside-illumi...
Read more

Xenvo Smartphone Lens Kit Overview

I recently took a look at the Xenvo "Ultimate Smartphone Lens Kit," an add-on system designed to enhance your phone's camera capabilities. I purchased this myself; it wasn't sent to me, and I wanted to share my experiences using it. The kit aims to give you both wider angle shots and detailed macro photos using a clip-on lens system. Let's see what's included and how well it works. The Xenvo "Ultimate Smartphone Lens" Kit packaging. What's in the Box? Opening the box reveals the core components: the lens system itself, which consists of a 15x macro lens and a 0.45x wide-angle lens attachment. It's important to note that the wide-angle piece needs to be screwed onto the macro lens to function correctly; using the wide-angle part alone doesn't really produce a usable image. Inside the box: the lens, case, and accessories. You also get a plastic clip mount to attach the lens assembly to your phone. Alongside the lenses, Xenvo includes severa...
Read more

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5mm (W x L) Viltrox: 65mm x 72mm Both lenses have an ape...
Read more