Skip to main content

The desire for practical photography.

When thinking practical photography, the first thing that comes to mind is convenience. The less that gets in your way, the better you can accomplish what you have in mind with as little hassle as possible.

While using convenient equipment is important, using what you have to do the job is important too.

  • Use the equipment you have on hand. Don’t waste time looking for the perfect piece of camera equipment, because it probably won’t truly make that much of a difference.
  • Use and bring as little stuff as possible. Sometimes I’ve not brought something and later though it might have been useful, but it isn’t the end of the world (take note: I’m not talking about professional photography where you should duplicate and cover all possibilities). Seeing as I use prime lenses most of the time, I’m use to managing with what is available. It’s actually much more fluid and experience when I don’t put much thought into gear while out in the field.
  • Avoid extras if you can given your goals for the session.
  • If you don’t need a flash, don’t bring it with you.
  • If you can get away with holding your flash in one hand and using a wireless trigger, do that rather than bringing a light-stand.

The type of equipment has become more and more important to me. While one side wants something like a full-frame optical DSLR camera, the more logical side has an interest in mirrorless systems. Some of the mirrorless systems are getting close feature wise, but still lack things like a 1/8000th shutter speed. I think eventually a APS-C or full-frame mirrorless camera will be a good direction to transition, or more likely supplement with if the funds are available. I’ve sometimes felt even my K-5 and K-7 feel too bulky for many things I do. The main issue is thickness of the camera.

I’ll admit, my style is at odds with my desire for convenience. Using prime lenses and flash increase the bulk two-fold as I often use two camera bodies and two prime lenses at the same time. I’m not really sure how to deal with that other than going back to using a normal lens exclusively as I have done in the past.

Lately I’ve been spending most of my time making videos for Youtube. While my cameras are not ideal for video, they are sufficient for what I’ve been doing so far.

I’ve been thinking of ways to practice Japanese and started reviewing American foods, but trying to use Japanese instead of English.

EDIT, here's a screenshot of the videos I had made back then. Some of them eventually got decent viewership, but the time consuming nature of using Japanese and other reasons I eventually left that idea. At the moment I post short food and drink reviews to the channel primarily meant for Amazon's Creator Hub (I earn commissions on there) where my page on there resides.



Most of the videos have been split-screen. What I do is use the K-5 with a 31mm lens and the K-7 and 100mm macro lens. The K-5 has an external microphone attached.




So the K-5 gives a general view, and the K-7 gives a close-up of the product I’m talking about. It works pretty well.






Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the sensor. The Z5ii gets a backside-illumi...

Xenvo Smartphone Lens Kit Overview

I recently took a look at the Xenvo "Ultimate Smartphone Lens Kit," an add-on system designed to enhance your phone's camera capabilities. I purchased this myself; it wasn't sent to me, and I wanted to share my experiences using it. The kit aims to give you both wider angle shots and detailed macro photos using a clip-on lens system. Let's see what's included and how well it works. The Xenvo "Ultimate Smartphone Lens" Kit packaging. What's in the Box? Opening the box reveals the core components: the lens system itself, which consists of a 15x macro lens and a 0.45x wide-angle lens attachment. It's important to note that the wide-angle piece needs to be screwed onto the macro lens to function correctly; using the wide-angle part alone doesn't really produce a usable image. Inside the box: the lens, case, and accessories. You also get a plastic clip mount to attach the lens assembly to your phone. Alongside the lenses, Xenvo includes severa...

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5mm (W x L) Viltrox: 65mm x 72mm Both lenses have an ape...