Skip to main content

Options in camera equipment insurance

I’ve been interested in insuring my camera equipment for a while now. Considering online retail value, my gear is getting up there in total cost. So much so that in my current situation I would not be able to replace much of it if something were to happen. I’m personally focused on just insuring my equipment as I don’t really do much that deals with professional liability like a photographer that owns a studio.

My research so far brings me to a few companies:
Zurich North America

  • They are said to be one of the insurance companies that is open to photographers, but there site doesn’t say anything on the subject.

Hill & Usher

  • They seem to be one of the most open companies toward photographers as their site includes a lot of information on the subject. The policy they show on their site seems geared toward professionals with studios or people that derive a lot of their income from photography

State Farm

  • I have general insurance from them, so I thought they would be a good option. I have a reasonable level of trust for their company and would expect them to honor anything that were to ever happen. They have a a well known “personal articles” policy as well as a business policy for camera equipment.
  • I was quoted $1.50 per $100 in gear for personal and $1.75 per $100 for business equipment. Not too bad assuming at this point that the policy covers a fair amount of possibilities.
  • I’ll assume most general insurance companies offer similar policies, at least for personal articles. Contact your company of choice to see what they offer. EDIT: They changed their mind about not taking a list of my equipment, so I eventually sent in photos and serial numbers of the high ticket items.

Professional Photographers of America

  • They offer discounted insurance for members. It looks like the insurance includes equipment as well as liability for people who desire that level of coverage. The negative of this option is that you must be a member of PPA, which isn’t cheap, plus the cost of insurance, which also doesn’t look cheap.

Hartford

  • Another company that is said to offer photography related policies. I couldn’t find any information by searching their site.

Tom Pickard

  • This company appears to specialize in photographer insurance. They offer large policies that cover everything from professional liability to office furniture and “portfolio coverage” (whatever that means…). They say their policies range from $500 – $700 per year. That seems like a good option for the professional.

Photo.net through Willis of Pennsylvania, Inc

  • The cost per year seems pretty reasonable at $10 per $1000, yet I feel the deductible per item is much too high at $250. Their liability price seems like a good value assuming they honor their coverage.

All that being said, I’m probably going to go with State Farm as it is the easiest option to use, not too expensive, and they offer a equipment only business related policy. Assuming their overall coverage terms are decent, I’ll be insured soon!

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. Check out the full video on YouTube:   The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the ...

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Check out the YouTube video here : Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5m...

Brightin Star 60mm f/2.8 2:1 Macro Lens Overview

In this article, I'm going to go over my experience using the Brightin Star 60mm f/2.8 2:1 macro lens. Brightin Star sent me this lens based on my collaboration terms . They had no say in the article or videos I've produced and have not previewed anything before publishing it.  The full video I produced about the lens: Build Quality The lens in hand. The Brightin Star 60mm f/2.8 lens feels solid. It features an all-metal casing, including a metal mount, which gives it a weighty feel in hand. This is a completely manual lens, meaning the aperture and focus are both mechanical. You won't get any electronic data transferred to your camera, which is generally fine for macro lenses since you'll typically be using manual focus anyway. However, not having any EXIF for aperture settings saved in the camera is something to consider.  The metal mount with no electrical contacts. The aperture ring is smooth with no clicks, which is useful for video situations. But for photography,...