Skip to main content

Lens Review: Focal MC Auto 135mm f2.8

One of the nice things about shooting with Pentax is that pretty much every lens that was made for K-mount will work on current DSLR cameras (the same can be said of M42 screw-mount with an adapter). There are probably a few exceptions, but I personally don’t know of any. This lens I’ll be looking at today is a fully manual telephoto prime lens with a large aperture. 


The lens has some heft to it!

A lens with specifications like this would cost hundreds of dollars if it had auto-focus and current-day lens coating. The reality is that it’s a bargain bin lens that can be had for probably around $50. I had bought this lens quite a few years ago from keh.com expecting a “generic 135mm f2.8” lens, and that’s what I got. From what I can tell, Focal was a brand-name for K-mart or Sears and MC stands for multi-coating.

Technical specifications for the lens:

  • Lens Mount: K-mount
  • Lens Construction: black metal with rubberized focus ring
  • Angle of View: 18 degrees (11 degrees in APS-C)
  • Aperture: f2.8
  • Number of Diaphragm Blades: unknown
  • Minimum Aperture: f22
  • Minimum Focusing Distance: unknown
  • Filter Diameter: 58mm
  • Maximum Magnification: unknown
  • Dimensions: unknown
  • Weight: unknown
  • Case: none
  • Objective Cap: none
  • Hood: built-in slide out type
  • Lens Aperture Ring: included
  • Tripod Adapter: none
  • Diaphragm Control: manual
  • Focal Length: 135mm (205mm in APS-C)
  • Notes: none

Lens and back cap.

General talk about the lens and its features:
This is a fully manual aperture and focus lens. The lens has a pretty standard focal length and maximum aperture for the time period it was made. With a maximum aperture of f2.8, you can use the lens in lower light situations without much difficulty, but is offset at times due to not having the ability to auto-focus. 

The lens construction is quite a bit above most lenses being produced these days as it is completely metal, the focus ring is smooth, the aperture control ring is also solid and smooth, and there is a built-in pull out metal lens hood. The lens is considerably large and heavy compared to similar models made in the same time period, but that’s probably due to its cheaper k-mart brand history.


Front of the lens.


What I like about the lens:

  • Nice build quality.
  • Built-in hood.
  • Sharp images.
  • Cheap telephoto lens.
  • Large maximum aperture.

What I’m not too fond of:

  • Manual focus and aperture take more effort, and the focus ring had a long range to rotate through.
  • No data connection to the camera body means no focal length or aperture information stored in EXIF data. That makes it difficult to identify images taken in the past.
  • Low contrast in strong sunlight.
  • Prone to green/purple fringing.

Lens with the built-in hood extended.

Images with a bit of analysis:


The default image was pretty bland and low contrast, but that’s easily fixed


A worst case scenario with green/purple fringing

This lens is able to produce sharp results






Only having manual focus available allows you to think of photos from a different point of view (foreground blur is intentional):

A few additional images:








Conclusion:
So it it worth $50 or so? I’d say it certainly is. Good build quality and decent optics should keep these lens away from the trash bin as long as Pentax users can mount old glass. The major negatives to not buying the lens in my opinion would be the physical size of the lens as well as the substandard lens coating that tends to result in washed out images. 

On the flip side, it’s quite easy to modify contrast in post processing that tends to bring out vivid and sharp results. With some care, this lens can be a cost effective way to get a moderate telephoto for your Pentax camera.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon Z5ii Announced and My Thoughts vs the Original Z5

The Nikon Z5ii was announced recently. I haven't actually used this new camera myself, so keep that in mind. This is going to be mostly me looking at the specs and comparing it to the original Nikon Z5, which I've been using for a few years now. The original Nikon Z5 camera. Overall, the original Z5 isn't a bad camera. I've gotten it to a point where it works how I want it to and it's reliable for what I do.  My main use case is often anime and comic conventions, going there and taking photos of people in cosplay. I usually use the 40mm f/2 lens on the Z5, and it works well for that.  First-person view using the Nikon Z5 at an anime convention. Nikon Z5ii vs Z5: The Spec Sheet Comparison  Nikon has a handy comparison section on their Z5ii page, so let's break down some key differences based on that and my experience with the original. Nikon's website comparing the Z5ii and the original Z5 specifications. First up, the sensor. The Z5ii gets a backside-illumi...
Read more

Xenvo Smartphone Lens Kit Overview

I recently took a look at the Xenvo "Ultimate Smartphone Lens Kit," an add-on system designed to enhance your phone's camera capabilities. I purchased this myself; it wasn't sent to me, and I wanted to share my experiences using it. The kit aims to give you both wider angle shots and detailed macro photos using a clip-on lens system. Let's see what's included and how well it works. The Xenvo "Ultimate Smartphone Lens" Kit packaging. What's in the Box? Opening the box reveals the core components: the lens system itself, which consists of a 15x macro lens and a 0.45x wide-angle lens attachment. It's important to note that the wide-angle piece needs to be screwed onto the macro lens to function correctly; using the wide-angle part alone doesn't really produce a usable image. Inside the box: the lens, case, and accessories. You also get a plastic clip mount to attach the lens assembly to your phone. Alongside the lenses, Xenvo includes severa...
Read more

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes!  Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M: B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947 Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M: Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0 ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!  Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video. Physical properties of the lens: The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.   Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox. Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5mm (W x L) Viltrox: 65mm x 72mm Both lenses have an ape...
Read more