Skip to main content

Lens Review: Pentax D-FA 100mm F2.8 WR Macro

The D-FA 100mm f2.8 WR Macro is one of the newer mid-range lenses from Pentax, which was based on a long line of 100mm macro lenses through the years. The main purpose of a lens like this is to have the ability to achieve 1:1 magnification of the subject, but also allow for a good amount of working distance from the subject thanks to the 100mm focal length. 



Macro lenses generally have the best sharpness characteristics out of all lens types, but the reason all lenses are not macro lenses is that a long amount of lens element travel and fine focus ring rotation is necessary to achieve that level of magnification and sharpness. Having a quick standard lens trades some of that ability for practicality.

Get the Pentax D-FA 100mm f/2.8 Macro WR lens through my links: 

As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases! 

Technical specifications for the lens:

  • Lens Mount: PENTAX KAF2
  • Lens Construction: 9 elements in 8 groups
  • Angle of View: 16 degrees (DSLR), 24.5 degrees (film SLR)
  • Aperture: F2.8
  • Number of Diaphragm Blades: 8 (curved)
  • Minimum Aperture: F32
  • Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.99′ (0.303m)
  • Filter Diameter: 49mm
  • Maximum Magnification: 1.00X
  • Dimensions: 2.6 x 3.2″ (65.0 x 80.5mm)
  • Weight: 12 oz (340g)
  • Case: S80-120
  • Objective Cap: O-LC49 49mm
  • Hood: PH-RBE 49mm
  • Lens Aperture Ring: none
  • Tripod Adapter: none
  • Diaphragm Control: Fully Automatic
  • Focal Length: 100mm (equiv 153mm on APS-C)
  • Notes: Weather Resistant Design, Quick-Shift Focus, SP (Super Protect) coating, Aluminum Housing, Curved Aperture Blades


General talk about the lens and its features:
As the SMCP-D-FA 100mm F2.8 lens is still available new, I’ll first go over the differences between the two lenses. The SMCP-D-FA lens has an aperture ring, so you can change the aperture by hand allowing it to work in older camera bodies that don’t have the ability to change aperture. 

 The D-FA WR on the other hand has weather resistance, aluminum casing, aluminum focus ring, and curved aperture blades. Both lenses are optically very similar or the same.

The D-FA WR lens is a respectably compact lens that you can hold in one hand easily. It is a full frame lens that will work on full frame Pentax film cameras that can control aperture (Pentax does not currently offer full frame digital SLRs). With the new aluminum casing, it is a very nice looking lens with that special Pentax limited lens feel. 


The hood connector and interior lens barrel are black plastic and most likely directly carried over from the older design with presumably some improvements in weather resistance between the two components. The lens name and serial number are engraved into the aluminum manual focus ring in a similar fashion to the DA* high end lenses. 

The manual focus ring takes around 5 hand rotations for me from end to end, with a nice solid feel as the interior barrel extends (meaning there is gasket material providing some extra resistance). The manual focus ring does rotate when the lens is in auto focus mode. In auto focus mode the lens is relatively slow on my K-7 because there is such a large amount of travel necessary from end to end. 

Noise when auto focusing is not quiet or short if you are on the other end of the focus range, but that’s just a standard property of screw-drive focus with a macro lens.

What I like about the lens:

  • Full frame lens (the FA specifier in DFA). Even with only APS-C available, it gives those cameras the “sweet spot” effect.
  • Extremely sharp lens.
  • Extremely good background blur (bokeh).
  • Very nice contrast-y color rendering.
  • Weather resistance.
  • Solid aluminum casing and focus ring.
  • Macro ability.
  • Image quality is still good with a decent teleconverter.
  • Quality related aspects of a DA* or Limited without a premium price (casing, lens details and serial number on the focus ring, solid feel).
  • Aperture of f2.8 is nice to have.
  • Relatively compact size.
  • Images are nice and bright through the whole frame even at f2.8.

What I’m not too fond of:

  • The interior barrel and hood mount are plastic, but it’s a welcome trade-off for a lower price.
  • The interior barrel extends a lot. I’m just not personally fond of lenses that have any type of extending barrel because it won’t ever be as water resistant as ones that don’t. However it’s really unlikely a lens like this would be made that doesn’t have an extending barrel due to the large amount of travel the front lens element makes (fully extended, the lens is almost twice as long).
  • Chromatic aberrations, specifically purple/green fringing, is visible in extreme lighting conditions.

Images with a bit of analysis:

ISO 1600, f2.8, 1/100th
Purple fringing/green fringing is visible in extreme lighting conditions.

ISO 200, f8.0, 1/160th: This is a seriously excellent macro lens.
EDIT: This might have been with a teleconverter, I can't recall.

ISO 400, f2.8, 1/15th
Here is what a result is like in macro with bright point light sources.

ISO 400, f3.2, 1/80th
This lens has exceptional bokeh properties.

Conclusion:
I think Pentax really needs to release more D-FA WR lenses. This lens is an excellent combination of performance, build quality, and price. It also is a future relevant lens as it can support a full frame 35mm imaging sensor (assuming Pentax eventually joins the FF party someday). 

 This lens is well worth the price of admission, which as of this review is around $610 from popular online retailers such as B&H and Adorama. It’s a very versatile lens and can be used for pretty much anything such as it’s intended macro purposes to portraiture and event photography. Just keep in mind focusing speed with macro lenses in general isn’t the fastest or is screw-drive focusing the quietest out there.


Popular posts from this blog

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. K...

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm...